SC attacks firecracker makers for using toxic chemicals, says they cannot violate right to life
New Delhi: A few days before the Diwali festival, the Supreme Court blasted firecracker makers for violating its 2018 judgment banning toxic ingredients like barium in fireworks. The Supreme Court declared that the main objective of the court is the “right to life of innocent people”.
The Supreme Court cited a CBI report on the use of toxic chemicals in the manufacture of firecrackers and noted that there had been a violation of court orders regarding the use of barium and the labeling of fireworks. ‘artifice.
READ ALSO | Delhi pollution committee imposes a complete ban on bursting and selling firecrackers until January 1
A bench of Judges MR Shah and AS Bopanna said the CBI found harmful chemicals such as barium salts in the items seized.
The bench also said that manufacturers such as Hindustan Fireworks and Standard Fireworks have purchased barium in huge amounts and used these chemicals in fireworks.
Dismissing the manufacturers’ claim that thousands of employees are winning out of the industry, the highest court said that “we must maintain a balance between employment, unemployment and the right to life and health of people. citizens”.
“Our main goal is the right to life of innocent citizens. If we find green crackers are there and accepted by the expert committee, we will place appropriate orders,” the PTI news agency said citing the bench, adding that in our country, the main difficulty is implementation.
The Supreme Court also said that every day there is a celebration in the country, but it must also consider other factors and cannot allow people to suffer and die.
READ ALSO | ‘Will solve the problem’: Punjab CM appeals to Navjot Singh Sidhu as his resignation sparks crisis
The court further observed that there is a violation of orders every day and in every religious event, victory processions, weddings, we can see contempt for orders and we will have to hold someone responsible, otherwise it will not will not stop at all.
However, the bench gave the manufacturers another opportunity to make their views known regarding the report of the Co-Director, CBI, Chennai and ordered that a copy of the CBI’s preliminary investigation report be served on all relevant attorneys. .
The court registered the case for the next hearing on October 6.