Toxic chemicals – Buscatox http://buscatox.info/ Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:31:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://buscatox.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/default1-120x120.png Toxic chemicals – Buscatox http://buscatox.info/ 32 32 BC town tells residents toxic chemicals are in the water and they should not drink it https://buscatox.info/bc-town-tells-residents-toxic-chemicals-are-in-the-water-and-they-should-not-drink-it/ Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:31:13 +0000 https://buscatox.info/bc-town-tells-residents-toxic-chemicals-are-in-the-water-and-they-should-not-drink-it/ The city of Abbotsford has been badly affected by the flooding in British Columbia and has now told its residents in the Sumas Prairie area not to drink or use the water. At a press conference on Wednesday, Abbotsford Mayor Henry Braun told the public that the new water advisory is due to “breaches in […]]]>

The city of Abbotsford has been badly affected by the flooding in British Columbia and has now told its residents in the Sumas Prairie area not to drink or use the water.

At a press conference on Wednesday, Abbotsford Mayor Henry Braun told the public that the new water advisory is due to “breaches in inaccessible water pipes that are impacting the water system. drinking water ”, which occurred after intense flooding.

The result is that any running water in Sumas Grassland can only be used for flushing the toilet. It cannot be used for anything else, such as drinking, showering, or cooking.

“As you can imagine, this is not clean water,” added Braun.

“We know there are hazardous, potentially toxic materials in this flood water, which is why we need to do an environmental assessment of the area to make sure it is safe,” he said. .

He also said that there are things like fertilizers, fuel tanks, tractors and vehicles, underwater in flood-prone areas, potentially contaminating the water.

There are also around 1,200 acres of blueberries underwater, according to Braun, who also said they were most likely dead.

This is one of the many losses caused by the flooding, including many farm animals and investments.

Braun also added that they are focusing on preparing for the weather forecast for the next few days, which is still expected to be marked by a lot of rain and thunderstorms.

The water advisory indicates that the water is not potable in the areas depicted on the map below.

City of Abbotsford

British Columbia is currently in a state of emergency after facing the tragic consequences of last week’s storms.

While working to repair and recover from the inclement weather, already inundated areas are now bracing for another round of storms.



Source link

]]>
Accommodation for vacations without the use of toxic chemicals https://buscatox.info/accommodation-for-vacations-without-the-use-of-toxic-chemicals/ Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:00:00 +0000 https://buscatox.info/accommodation-for-vacations-without-the-use-of-toxic-chemicals/ It’s easy to trick your friends into thinking you’re the most host charcuterie board – assorted snacks mounted on a large platter, plate or cutting board. Dozens of videos online show even the most ignorant and clumsy how to make a delicious spread of antipasto-type foods. The only problem? Toxic chemicals can be lurking in […]]]>

It’s easy to trick your friends into thinking you’re the most host charcuterie board – assorted snacks mounted on a large platter, plate or cutting board. Dozens of videos online show even the most ignorant and clumsy how to make a delicious spread of antipasto-type foods.

The only problem? Toxic chemicals can be lurking in some of these treats, as the mainstays of deli boards like cured meat and dried fruit, and generic additions like hummus, can all contain ingredients that are harmful to health.

Here’s how to put together a healthier charcuterie board this season.

Deli

Foods like salami and sausage – the centerpiece of most charcuterie boards – are often made with nitrates and nitrites, which add color and extend shelf life. But these chemicals increase the risk of cancer.

And although organic options and products with “no nitrates or nitrites added” claims do not allow the addition of these ingredients, they may still contain nitrate naturally derived from celery powder or other sources, which will be added. noted on the label.

It’s best to make dried meat naturally an occasional food, not a regular part of your diet. Consider going vegetarian and skipping meat altogether or choosing a plant-based option.

If you include meat on your board, check the labels for sodium and potassium nitrates and nitrites and avoid them. Or choose organic options or other “most trusted” choices from our guide to decoding meat and dairy labels, which come with other benefits, such as reduced use of antibiotics.

Two or three kinds of cheese

In addition to cold meats, cheese is the other highlight of a typical charcuterie board. Most cheeses do not do well in our Food Notes database, which ranks products based on nutritional value, processing and ingredients of concern. The vast majority of cheeses tend to be high in calories, saturated fat, and sodium.

But it’s less likely to be full of harmful food additives. Check out our meat and dairy label decoder for the “most reliable” cheeses or choose organic, which does not contain antibiotics or hormones. There are also a growing number of brands of plant-based cheeses.

Crackers or rolls

Crackers and bread may contain potassium bromate, a chemical leavening agent on EWGs dirty dozen food additives list. It is classified by California as a known carcinogen and by an international cancer research agency as a possible human carcinogen. To avoid potassium bromate, check the ingredient labels and our Food Notes database.

Crackers and bread may contain other ingredients that are harmful to health. They can be made with soybean oil, an artificial trans fat, which contains food additive tert-butylhydroquinone, better known as TBHQ. Look for organic crackers made with no added sugar for the most nutritious ones that have the fewest health concerns.

Jam or jelly

A spoonful of jam and jelly on your deli board may not have a lot of unhealthy food additives, but in many cases it’s almost pure sugar – corn syrup and high fructose corn syrup. . One type of grape jelly, for example, contains 65% sugar by weight and contains three teaspoons of added and natural sugar per serving.

Bottom line: Load up your snack board with less sugary foods.

Hummus

You can place a small bowl of hummus on your plate, drizzled with a little olive oil and sprinkled with paprika. Be careful, however, to choose your hummus.

GTE analysis of this popular food have found high levels of the weedkiller glyphosate in many store brands. But the levels varied considerably. Although most biological samples contained glyphosate, the levels were much lower than non-organic options.

Check out our review to see which store brands had lower levels of glyphosate and check dietary scores for other issues, such as added sugar, trans fat, and “flavor.”

Fruit

Pieces of apple or pear or a handful of grapes will pleasantly decorate your charcuterie board. It’s best to buy these organic due to the high level of pesticides found on most non-organic fruits. It remains even after washing the fruit.

Our Buyer’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce ™ shows which types of fruit are best to buy organic and which can be purchased non-organic, if needed. Bonus points for choosing locally grown produce, which reduces carbon-emitting transport.

Dried fruit

Dried fruits may contain some of EWG’s food additives of most concern, such as food coloring Yellow 5 and Red 40. It may also contain preservatives like sulfites and sulfur dioxide.

Sulfur dioxide has been shown to cause asthma as well as reproductive and developmental toxicity, especially when inhaled. And although the levels of exposure to dried fruits may not be a risk for most individuals, the use of gas during storage can pose a health risk to workers.

Some dried fruits are processed with other artificial ingredients, such as “aroma, A mixture of chemicals added for taste and smell. And if it is not organic, dried fruits contain pesticide residues.

Even dried fruits with minimal processing can be high in sugar, so it’s best to avoid making them a centerpiece of your spread.

Get Your Free Guide: EWG’s Guide to Food Additives

Nuts

A handful of nuts – something tasty and salty that complements all other snacks – makes a great addition to your deli board. You can’t go wrong with organic shelled and unprocessed nuts – a great source of protein at a fairly low cost. If you want them roasted, salted or flavored, try make yours to avoid added sugar and artificial flavor.

Fresh vegetables

You may want to stack your board with chunks of chopped fresh vegetables. Cucumber, cherry tomatoes, carrots, and radishes are great choices, both visually and nutritionally.

But vegetables contain residues of the potentially harmful chemical pesticides with which they are grown. Celery, peppers and tomatoes are part of the Dirty Dozen ™ of products with the most pesticide residue, so choose organic products whenever possible. Be sure to check out the Buyer’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce ™ to find the best items to buy.

Efforts to make food safer

Even a few changes to your planned refreshments can help you and your guests avoid toxic chemicals and too much sugar.

But the real solution to the unhealthy ingredients in our food is better food safety regulations in the United States. Two bills currently before Congress would be helpful.

Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) Introduced the Toxic Free Food Act ordering the Food and Drug Administration to close a loophole that allows food and chemical companies to determine whether food additives are safe. It would require independent experts, not company scientists, to determine whether the substance is safe.

The other bill is the Food Chemicals Re-evaluation Act, introduced by Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), who would create a new office within the FDA dedicated to the re-evaluation of food chemicals in the market, such as TBHQ. This would require the agency to reassess the safety of at least 10 chemicals used in food or food packaging every three years.


Source link

]]>
Toxic chemicals found in makeup – even high-end brands, survey finds – Boston 25 News https://buscatox.info/toxic-chemicals-found-in-makeup-even-high-end-brands-survey-finds-boston-25-news/ Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:08:28 +0000 https://buscatox.info/toxic-chemicals-found-in-makeup-even-high-end-brands-survey-finds-boston-25-news/ It is part of the daily routine of most women – putting on makeup. But some of these products might contain poisons never before listed on the ingredient list, including some premium brands. Makeup that women put on their skin may contain PFAS or permanent chemicals that never break down. “It’s like taking a big […]]]>

It is part of the daily routine of most women – putting on makeup.

But some of these products might contain poisons never before listed on the ingredient list, including some premium brands.

Makeup that women put on their skin may contain PFAS or permanent chemicals that never break down.

“It’s like taking a big risk for beauty,” said makeup artist Stephanie Bennett.

She sells her homemade lip products in her kitchen.

But she fears that even some of them may contain PFAS or per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances.

“Now that I know about this ingredient, I’ve even considered doing third-party testing on my own products,” Bennett said.

Researchers at the University of Notre Dame have found PFAS in several makeup products, from drugstores to high-end brands. Neither puts it on the label.

“We believe there is an intentional use of this that is not reported. We believe the consumer has a right to know what they are buying, ”said Graham Peaslee, Ph.D. professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.

Several women interviewed on the matter said they wanted to know what was in their makeup.

“I think you should list the ingredients and let the consumer decide whether or not they want to add it to their face,” said Sherri Hodge.

“That’s why I look at the labels to see if they have certain chemicals in them, if they have certain things in them, and if it’s something that I will never put on my face, I will want to know that,” said Tonice Taylor.

The Food and Drug Administration has the power to regulate cosmetics in America and sets guidelines, but generally allows the industry to monitor itself. Bennett said the government must take action with regulations.

“I have a brand of house makeup and nobody regulates me, and I do it here in my house in my kitchen. And I, you know, I sell to thousands of thousands of customers in the United States, across the country. “Sea up to, you know, Canada. So yeah, nobody’s regulating me,” Bennett said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says PFAS can lead to cancer, liver damage, increased risk of asthma, thyroid disease, and fertility problems.

Notre Dame researchers said long-lasting makeup has the most PFAS.

Two items were at the top of the list.

“The waterproof mascaras and new liquid lips that paint over lipstick that last a really long time,” Peaslee said.

The CDC and the FDA are studying how much PFAS the human body can handle before it typically gets sick.

PFAS are found in many items we all use, such as non-stick pans, fast food containers, and stain and water resistant clothing and furniture. They are also used in makeup so that it lasts longer and spreads more easily.

PFAS are called permanent chemicals because they never break down completely. The chemicals end up contaminating our soil, air and water.

Another concern is that PFAS can build up in your body, especially if you use products that contain PFAS on your skin, eyes, and mouth.

“Although a small amount, because even at this level you’re going to have a buildup in the blood very quickly,” Peaslee said.

Bennett said his clients are more aware these days of the potential dangers of what’s in their makeup. They are asking for less toxic products. However, she said that many women will still sacrifice their health for beauty, but not her.

“You don’t want to risk not being able to have a baby because, you know, you use it as a lipstick or mascara,” Bennett said.

Unlike the United States, Europe has very strict makeup regulations. Everything is tested before being marketed. But here in the United States, it’s more of a hands-off approach with companies doing their own testing.

Notre Dame researchers say the good news is that several makeup companies are now identifying products in their line that contain PFAS and are removing them.

Download the Free Boston 25 News app for the latest news alerts.

Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW



Source link

]]>
Your fast food packaging contains toxic chemicals. Why is this allowed? | Norah MacKendrick https://buscatox.info/your-fast-food-packaging-contains-toxic-chemicals-why-is-this-allowed-norah-mackendrick/ https://buscatox.info/your-fast-food-packaging-contains-toxic-chemicals-why-is-this-allowed-norah-mackendrick/#respond Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:14:00 +0000 https://buscatox.info/your-fast-food-packaging-contains-toxic-chemicals-why-is-this-allowed-norah-mackendrick/ IIt’s no surprise that fast food is generally unhealthy. But now there’s a new reason for concern: According to a new study from George Washington University, fast food containers (such as wrappers used for burgers and burritos) contain toxic chemicals known to interfere with our reproductive system and contribute to attention and learning. troubles. Simply […]]]>

IIt’s no surprise that fast food is generally unhealthy. But now there’s a new reason for concern: According to a new study from George Washington University, fast food containers (such as wrappers used for burgers and burritos) contain toxic chemicals known to interfere with our reproductive system and contribute to attention and learning. troubles. Simply put, our burgers and burritos are packaged in toxic waste.

Many ready meals come with an ingredient list that tells consumers what has gone into the product they eat or drink. Of course, this list does not include the chemicals used to make the box, bag or wrapper containing the food, or other materials that come in contact with our meal, such as the plastic gloves used to handle the food. sandwich fillings. But these compounds are found in our food and we ingest them.

George Washington’s study found ortho-phthalates in burritos and hamburgers, while another study determined that PFAS chemicals (the non-stick chemicals made famous by the recent Dark Waters movie) are in over half of the contact paper used to wrap desserts and pastries. goods and line your pizza box.

Exposure to PFAS is associated with testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and immune dysfunction, among many other alarming conditions. According to population studies, all Americans now have traces of ortho-phthalates and PFAS in their bodies, along with dozens of other compounds.

It’s understandable if you make a commitment to never eat a burrito or burger again, or at least if you make a commitment to stop giving them to your kids. But, as I’ve shown in my research, blaming ourselves and promising to eat or shop differently gets us almost nowhere in the long run. To make the food system safer for everyone, we need to direct some of our disgust and anger at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the companies that make food packaging.

The FDA is responsible for ensuring that convenience foods and food packaging are safe, but it has absolutely failed to do so. Time and time again, the FDA has ignored calls to reform the way it assesses the safety of food and food packaging materials, or has relied on the goodwill of manufacturers to voluntarily change the packaging materials it uses. they use.

Fast food chains bear the lion’s share of the blame for this problem. Campaigns demonstrating the toxicity of food packaging materials have made the industry aware that its packaging is full of toxic substances. A few companies, like McDonald’s, have promised to phase out some of these harmful compounds, like PFAS, but many have not.

In fact, the chains continue to actively promote their products to black and Hispanic youth through targeted marketing. It is worrying that companies are actively promoting products that they know are harmful. This is particularly alarming because adolescence is a time of rapid growth and development which is susceptible to the harmful effects of toxic chemicals. As sociologist Naa Oyo Kwate shows in her work, these companies are trying to lock in their consumer base and a low-wage workforce by locating their franchises in poor neighborhoods and communities of color.

Some might argue that consumers should take the blame here, arguing that there is no excuse to buy foods known to be unhealthy. But pointing fingers at consumers ignores how systemic and regulatory this problem is. It allows the government and fast food chains to extricate themselves to enrich shareholders at the expense of public health.

To protect the public from the chemicals in all food packaging, the FDA must radically review its food packaging standards and force food companies to find safer and greener options. We know the agency can be attentive to public health – it has, after all, scrutinized the safety data of Covid-19 vaccines in order to come up with safe and effective options to end the pandemic. The FDA must take the same cautious approach to monitoring our food supply.

Until we have real action from government and business, the responsibility for finding safe packaging will shift to neighborhoods with high density of fast food franchises and busy consumers looking for a convenient meal on their way home from work. With our busy lives, we have enough worries. It is time for US government and business to act.


Source link

]]>
https://buscatox.info/your-fast-food-packaging-contains-toxic-chemicals-why-is-this-allowed-norah-mackendrick/feed/ 0
WARNING: Toxic chemicals found in makeup – even high-end brands, survey finds – WSB-TV Channel 2 https://buscatox.info/warning-toxic-chemicals-found-in-makeup-even-high-end-brands-survey-finds-wsb-tv-channel-2/ https://buscatox.info/warning-toxic-chemicals-found-in-makeup-even-high-end-brands-survey-finds-wsb-tv-channel-2/#respond Tue, 02 Nov 2021 22:39:28 +0000 https://buscatox.info/warning-toxic-chemicals-found-in-makeup-even-high-end-brands-survey-finds-wsb-tv-channel-2/ ATLANTA – It’s part of the daily routine of most women – putting on makeup. But some of these products might contain poisons never before listed on the ingredient list, including some premium brands. Makeup that women put on their skin may contain PFAS or permanent chemicals that never break down. “It’s like taking a […]]]>

ATLANTA – It’s part of the daily routine of most women – putting on makeup.

But some of these products might contain poisons never before listed on the ingredient list, including some premium brands.

Makeup that women put on their skin may contain PFAS or permanent chemicals that never break down.

“It’s like taking a big risk for beauty,” said Stephanie Bennett, Atlanta metro makeup artist.

She sells her homemade lip products in her DeKalb County kitchen.

But she fears that even some of them may contain PFAS or per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances.

[DO YOU HAVE A STORY? Submit a story idea to 2 Investigates]

“Now that I know about this ingredient, I’ve even considered doing third-party testing on my own products,” Bennett said.

Researchers at the University of Notre Dame have found PFAS in several makeup products, from drugstores to high-end brands. Neither puts it on the label.

“We believe there is an intentional use of this that is not reported. We believe that the consumer has a right to know what he is buying, ”said Graham Peaslee, Ph.D. professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.

Women said Channel 2 investigative reporter Sophia Choi they want to know what’s in their makeup.

“I think you should list the ingredients and let the consumer decide whether or not they want to add it to their face,” said Sherri Hodge.

“That’s why I look at the labels to see if they have certain chemicals in them, if they have certain things in them, and if it’s something that I will never put on my face, I will want to know that,” said Tonice Taylor.

MORE STORIES FROM 2 SURVEYS:

The Food and Drug Administration has the power to regulate cosmetics in America and sets guidelines, but generally allows the industry to monitor itself. Bennett said the government must take action with regulations.

“I have a brand of house makeup and nobody regulates me, and I do it here in my house in my kitchen. And I, you know, sell to thousands of thousands of customers from the United States, overseas to, you know, Canada. So yeah, nobody’s regulating me, ”Bennett said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says PFAS can lead to cancer, liver damage, increased risk of asthma, thyroid disease, and fertility problems.

Notre Dame researchers said long-lasting makeup has the most PFAS.

Two items were at the top of the list.

“The waterproof mascaras and new liquid lips that paint over lipstick that last a really long time,” Peaslee said.

The CDC and the FDA are studying how much PFAS the human body can handle before it typically gets sick.

PFAS are found in many items we all use, such as non-stick pans, fast food containers, and stain and water resistant clothing and furniture. They are also used in makeup to make it last longer and spread more easily.

PFAS are called permanent chemicals because they never break down completely. The chemicals end up contaminating our soil, air and water.

Another concern is that PFAS can build up in your body, especially if you use products that contain PFAS on your skin, eyes, and mouth.

“Although a small amount, because even at this level you’re going to have a buildup in the blood very quickly,” Peaslee said.

Bennett said his clients are more aware these days of the potential dangers of what’s in their makeup. They are asking for less toxic products. However, she said that many women will still sacrifice their health for beauty, but not her.

“You don’t want to risk not being able to have a baby because, you know, you use it as a lipstick or a mascara,” Bennett said.

Unlike the United States, Europe has very strict makeup regulations. Everything is tested before being marketed. But here in the United States, it’s more of a hands-off approach, with companies doing their own testing.

Notre Dame researchers say the good news is that several makeup companies are now identifying products in their line that contain PFAS and are removing them.

IN OTHER NEWS:


Source link

]]>
https://buscatox.info/warning-toxic-chemicals-found-in-makeup-even-high-end-brands-survey-finds-wsb-tv-channel-2/feed/ 0
Many e-cigarette vaping liquids contain toxic chemicals: study https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-study/ https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-study/#respond Fri, 22 Oct 2021 05:10:51 +0000 https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-study/ New New Australian research has found that most e-liquids contain chemicals known to cause breathing problems and lung damage when inhaled. Most e-liquids contained ingredients that have since been banned by the TGA. As of October 1, it is illegal to buy e-liquids containing nicotine without a doctor’s prescription anywhere in Australia except South Australia. […]]]>

New


New Australian research has found that most e-liquids contain chemicals known to cause breathing problems and lung damage when inhaled.

Most e-liquids contained ingredients that have since been banned by the TGA.


As of October 1, it is illegal to buy e-liquids containing nicotine without a doctor’s prescription anywhere in Australia except South Australia.

But vaping with nicotine-free e-liquids is not illegal in Australia (although in some jurisdictions e-cigarette devices themselves are illegal).

Vaping is gaining popularity in Australia, especially among young people.

I co-led a research team that wanted to know what is in the nicotine-free e-liquids that vapers inhale, and their potential health effects.

Our study, published this week in The Australian Medical Journal, found that most e-liquids contain chemicals known to cause breathing problems and lung damage when inhaled. Most contained ingredients that have since been banned by Australia’s drug regulatory authority, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

We have also found that all e-liquids contain substances for which the health effects from inhalation exposure are unknown.

It is clear that vaping is not safe and that e-cigarettes have not been approved as smoking cessation devices.

What did we study?
A few years ago, we carried out a small study which consisted in chemically analyzing 10 e-liquids purchased in Australia. All were labeled “nicotine free”.

Our research, published in The Australian Medical Journal in 2019, was surprising and concerning. We found that 60% of the fluids contained nicotine. In some cases, it was at levels high enough that it wasn’t just a trace of contamination.

We also found that the 10 e-liquids contained a chemical called “2-chlorophenol,” which is often used in pesticides and disinfectants and is a known irritant to the skin and lungs.

Most e-liquids also contained 2-aminooctanoic acid, an amino acid found in biological products of mammals, including feces, urine, and blood. Its presence was potentially the result of contamination by one of these substances during the manufacturing or packaging processes.

Our results prompted us to expand on our previous study.

This time around, we analyzed 65 Australian e-liquids, including using a method to better understand how heating e-liquids for vaping could change their chemical components.

This is the most in-depth review of Australian e-liquids to date and was conducted by Curtin University and the Wal-yan Respiratory Research Center, in collaboration with the Lung Foundation Australia, the Minderoo Foundation and the Cancer Council Western Australia.

All of the e-liquids we studied were purchased online or in physical stores across Australia. All of them have been advertised as ‘bestsellers’, made in Australia and nicotine free, so it’s likely that they are representative of what many Australian vapers might use.

None of the e-liquids were labeled with a full ingredient list, so it’s impossible for users to know which chemicals they are inhaling. It also means that not all e-liquids we tested would comply with European Union labeling regulations.

What else did we find?
Most of the flavoring chemicals we have detected are “generally considered safe” by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) when used in food and drink. But there is a big difference between a chemical that can be safely ingested and one that can be safely inhaled over the long term.

We have also detected nicotine in some e-liquids, however, it was found much less frequently and in much lower concentrations than in our previous study. It may indicate a cleaner manufacturing process.

We only tested “free” nicotine, which is typically used in both conventional cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy. So the e-liquids may have contained another type of nicotine, called nicotine salts, which are much more commonly used today than they were a few years ago.

We also found 2-chlorophenol, although this was only in about half of the e-liquids tested. Either way, contamination of e-liquids with this known toxic chemical, which has no valid reason to be present, remains a significant problem.

A range of other chemicals of concern have been commonly detected, including benzaldehyde, trans-cinnamaldehyde and menthol. These chemicals are added for their almond, cinnamon, and mint flavors, respectively.

Benzaldehyde has been found in all but four e-liquids, while menthol and trans-cinnamaldehyde have been found in about three-quarters of e-liquids. The presence of these chemical flavors was of concern for a number of reasons.

First, they are all known to alter the effects of nicotine. Menthol makes nicotine more addictive.

Benzaldehyde and trans-cinnamaldehyde are known to inhibit an enzyme called “CYP2A6”. CYP2A6 is responsible for the metabolism and detoxification of many drugs to which humans are exposed, including nicotine.

When its function is impaired by these flavoring chemicals, it means that a vaper using e-liquids containing nicotine will have nicotine in their body for a longer period of time before it is processed by the body.

Benzaldehyde is also a respiratory irritant and can reduce a person’s ability to fight infections in the lungs. Trans-cinnamaldehyde has even more serious effects on immune cells in the lungs.

Both of these chemicals are now included in the TGA’s list of banned e-liquids, meaning they are banned in Australian e-liquids. Menthol is not banned by the TGA, but it is banned in tobacco cigarettes in some countries. In this study, e-liquids were analyzed before the entry into force of the ban.

This research clearly shows that Australian e-liquids contain a range of chemicals that are known to negatively impact health or for which the potential health impacts from inhalation exposure are unknown.

Much more research is needed in this space before we can make informed decisions about the use of nicotine-free and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes, and to better understand the impact of vaping on our health.

Log in below to join the conversation.

First published in The Conversation. Read the original article.



nicotine vaping from electronic cigarettes


newsGP weekly poll
Have you met patients who say they are “waiting for Novavax”?


Source link

]]>
https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-study/feed/ 0
Non-critical amount of toxic chemicals found in private wells https://buscatox.info/non-critical-amount-of-toxic-chemicals-found-in-private-wells/ Tue, 19 Oct 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://buscatox.info/non-critical-amount-of-toxic-chemicals-found-in-private-wells/ The entrance to Cannon Air Base near Clovis. (Source: US Air Force) Copyright © 2021 Albuquerque Journal None of the 57 private water wells sampled in Curry and Roosevelt counties showed dangerous levels of PFAS, the toxic “forever chemicals” that leaked from the fire foam used at the air base. de Cannon near Clovis. The […]]]>
The entrance to Cannon Air Base near Clovis. (Source: US Air Force)

Copyright © 2021 Albuquerque Journal

None of the 57 private water wells sampled in Curry and Roosevelt counties showed dangerous levels of PFAS, the toxic “forever chemicals” that leaked from the fire foam used at the air base. de Cannon near Clovis.

The New Mexico Department of the Environment worked with the US Geological Survey from April to June to sample agricultural and drinking water wells for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS.

The state legislature funded the $ 100,000 testing program in 2020.

“This (data collection) effort provides regulators, residents and businesses with critical information about the safety of our water supply and adds to our growing body of knowledge about the presence of these harmful chemicals in eastern Canada. New Mexico, ”said Environment Secretary James Kenney. .

Nine wells had low concentrations of PFAS chemicals that are well within the safety standards of other states, according to results released Monday.

The remaining 48 wells detected no PFAS.

No tests have detected PFOA or PFOS, two types of PFAS compounds with a United States Environmental Protection Agency lifetime health notice of 70 parts per trillion.

Strong chemical bonds are ideal for waterproofing agents and non-stick pans. But PFAS remain in the blood indefinitely.

The EPA links exposure to low birth weight, high cholesterol, and certain cancers.

John Kern, director of the community group Clean Water Partnership in Cannon, which has helped recruit landowners to have their wells tested, said the state study is a “good place to start.”

But military and state agencies shouldn’t take the sampling as a sign that cleanup can wait, Kern said, and should perform “more methodical” testing on residents’ water and blood.

“Because that’s the real problem… not just how PFAS manifested in a glass of tap water, but how it could have physically affected the residents here,” Kern said.

The NMED results were announced the same day the EPA released a strategy to tackle PFAS pollution.

The federal agency will move towards applicable drinking water standards for chemicals and limit industrial discharges of PFAS into waterways.

Kenney and Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham have called on the government to put PFAS on the hazardous waste list.

“My state needs this designation in order to act quickly and protect its citizens, water, economy and environment from further contamination from this state’s biggest PFAS polluters,” Lujan Grisham wrote in a letter. June at the EPA.

The state is suing the Department of Defense for the contamination of Cannon and Holloman Air Force bases.

Theresa Davis is a member of the Report for America body covering Water and the Environment for the Albuquerque Journal.


Source link

]]>
California wineries that once used only toxic chemicals to protect vines now use nesting owls https://buscatox.info/california-wineries-that-once-used-only-toxic-chemicals-to-protect-vines-now-use-nesting-owls/ Sun, 17 Oct 2021 07:00:00 +0000 https://buscatox.info/california-wineries-that-once-used-only-toxic-chemicals-to-protect-vines-now-use-nesting-owls/ Napa Valley winemakers are increasingly turning to wing workers for their pest control and moving away from the super toxic pesticides that poison everything, including their wine. Barn owls in particular, but also hawks and other birds of prey, known as raptors, are welcomed to California vineyards for their skill at catching rats, camping voles, […]]]>

Napa Valley winemakers are increasingly turning to wing workers for their pest control and moving away from the super toxic pesticides that poison everything, including their wine.

Barn owls in particular, but also hawks and other birds of prey, known as raptors, are welcomed to California vineyards for their skill at catching rats, camping voles, and gobbling up waffles – and scientists studying the impact of these strategies are finding encouraging results.

For years, Californian winemakers took pride in the I do not know what, inherent in their wines that have made Napa a world-class grape growing destination.

But, they were using super toxic “rodent-icides”, a type of poison used to kill mice and voles that munch on vines. The poison had become an industry standard in the state until the 1980s, when raptors, trapping, and other more holistic methods became more popular.

According to the nonprofit Napa Green, a trend towards chemical-free agriculture statewide is reflected in the tripling of organic vineyard acreage since 2005, with the number of organic acres having doubled over the past year. the last decade alone.

The barn owl is one of the most effective pest control in the world, found on 6 of our 7 continents and capable of eating 3,400 rodents each year.

Matt Johnson is a wildlife professor at Humboldt State who years ago started a program to study raptor pest control in vineyards and research the results. A survey by graduate student Brooks Estes found that four-fifths of California’s 75 winemakers deliberately invite owls to their property by building birdhouses.

Allison Huysman, Humboldt Stat

“We work primarily in Napa Valley, where there are over 300 barn owl nesting boxes,” Johnson wrote on his department’s webpage.

“You can literally put a barn owl nesting box right where you think you have a problem with small mammals, and voila! The owls will start using this area, ”John C. Robinson, a local ornithologist, told Bay Nature Magazine.

Courtesy of Humboldt State

Johnson and his graduate students have discovered that barn owls like their boxes to sit at least 9 feet off the ground, facing the sun, next to grassy fields, and preferably away from wooded acres.

Jaime Carlino, Humbolt State Graduate Student, by Matt Johnson

RELATED: The brewery uses “non-adoptable” wild cats to hunt rats, with great success

Early surveys suggest that it is possible that more winegrowers use barn owls and even traps than pesticides, but it is unclear to what extent the use of pesticides has been avoided in favor of owls.

All the incentives are there, however, as using owls costs a lot less than trapping: 26 cents per rodent compared to $ 8.11. It is also helping a beautiful group of species to thrive.

RELATED: Revolutionary Non-Toxic Pest Control That Won’t Harm Bees

Ventura County uses birds, including hawks, hawks and owls, instead of rodenticides, on nearly 100 dikes and dams, as rodent burrows can damage structures. The Ventura County Watershed Protection Department reports savings of $ 216,000 per mile of canal compared to traps.

Owls not only help winemakers cut costs, but they make vineyards greener and ecosystems healthier, a worthy result that reflects the majesty of the famous valley.

STEAL this from friends who love wine and owls – Share on social media …


Source link

]]>
Many e-cigarette vaping liquids contain toxic chemicals: new … https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-new/ https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-new/#respond Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:04:44 +0000 https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-new/ (MENAFN – The Conversation) As of October 1, it is illegal to buy e-liquids containing nicotine without a doctor’s prescription anywhere in Australia except South Australia. But vaping with nicotine-free e-liquids is not illegal in Australia (although in some jurisdictions e-cigarette devices themselves are illegal). Vaping is gaining popularity in Australia, especially among young people. […]]]>

(MENAFN – The Conversation)

As of October 1, it is illegal to buy e-liquids containing nicotine without a doctor’s prescription anywhere in Australia except South Australia.

But vaping with nicotine-free e-liquids is not illegal in Australia (although in some jurisdictions e-cigarette devices themselves are illegal).

Vaping is gaining popularity in Australia, especially among young people.

I co-led a research team that wanted to know what is in the nicotine-free e-liquids that vapers inhale, and their potential health effects.

Our study, published this week in The Medical Journal of Australia, found that most e-liquids contained chemicals known to cause breathing problems and lung damage when inhaled. Most contained ingredients that have since been banned by Australia’s drug regulatory authority, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

We have also found that all e-liquids contain substances for which the health effects from inhalation exposure are unknown.

It is clear that vaping is not safe and that e-cigarettes have not been approved as smoking cessation devices.

Read more: Vaping: As an imaging scientist, I fear the deadly impact on people’s lungs

What did we study?

A few years ago, we carried out a small study which consisted in chemically analyzing ten e-liquids purchased in Australia. All were labeled “nicotine free”.

Our research, published in The Medical Journal of Australia in 2019, was surprising and concerning. We found that 60% of the fluids contained nicotine. In some cases, it was at levels high enough that it wasn’t just a trace of contamination.

We also found that all ten e-liquids contained a chemical called “2-Chlorophenol”, which is often used in pesticides and disinfectants and is a known irritant to the skin and lungs.

Most e-liquids also contained “2-aminooctanoic acid, which is an amino acid found in biological products of mammals, including feces, urine, and blood.” Its presence was potentially the result of contamination by one of these substances during the manufacturing or packaging processes.

Our results prompted us to expand on our previous study.

This time around, we analyzed 65 Australian e-liquids, including using a method to better understand how heating e-liquids for vaping could change their chemical components.

This is the most in-depth review of Australian e-liquids to date and was conducted by Curtin University and the Wal-yan Respiratory Research Center, in collaboration with the Lung Foundation Australia, the Minderoo Foundation and the Cancer Council Western Australia.

All of the e-liquids we studied were purchased online or in physical stores across Australia. All of them have been advertised as ‘bestsellers’, made in Australia and nicotine free, so it’s likely that they are representative of what many Australian vapers might use.

None of the e-liquids were labeled with a full ingredient list, so it’s impossible for users to know which chemicals they are inhaling. It also means that not all e-liquids we tested would comply with European Union labeling regulations.

Read more: Vaping is glamorized on social media, putting young people at risk

What else did we find?

Most of the flavoring chemicals we have detected are “generally considered safe” by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) when used in food and drink. But there is a big difference between a chemical that can be safely ingested and one that can be safely inhaled over the long term.

We have also detected nicotine in some e-liquids, however, it was found much less frequently and in much lower concentrations than in our previous study. It may indicate a cleaner manufacturing process.

We only tested “free base” nicotine, which is typically used in both conventional cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy. So the e-liquids may have contained another type of nicotine, called nicotine salts, which are much more commonly used today than they were a few years ago.

We also found 2-chlorophenol, although this was only in about half of the e-liquids tested. Either way, the contamination of e-liquids with this known toxic chemical, which has no valid reason to be present, remains a significant problem.

Most of the e-liquids studied contained chemicals known to cause respiratory problems in humans. E-Liquids UK / Unsplash, CC BY

A range of other chemicals of concern have been commonly detected, including benzaldehyde, trans-cinnamaldehyde and menthol. These chemicals are added for their almond, cinnamon, and mint flavors, respectively.

Benzaldehyde has been found in all but four e-liquids, while menthol and trans-cinnamaldehyde have been found in about three-quarters of e-liquids. The presence of these chemical flavors was of concern for a number of reasons.

First, they are all known to alter the effects of nicotine. Menthol makes nicotine more addictive.

Benzaldehyde and trans-cinnamaldehyde are known to inhibit an enzyme called “CYP2A6”. CYP2A6 is responsible for the metabolism and detoxification of many drugs to which humans are exposed, including nicotine.

When its function is impaired by these flavoring chemicals, it means that a vaper using e-liquids containing nicotine will have nicotine in their body for a longer period of time before it is processed by the body.

Benzaldehyde is also a respiratory irritant and can reduce a person’s ability to fight infections in the lungs. Trans-cinnamaldehyde has even more serious effects on immune cells in the lungs.

Both of these chemicals are now included in the TGA’s list of banned e-liquids, meaning they are banned in Australian e-liquids. Menthol is not banned by the TGA, but it is banned in tobacco cigarettes in some countries. In this study, e-liquids were analyzed before the entry into force of the ban.

This research clearly shows that Australian e-liquids contain a range of chemicals that are known to negatively impact health, or for which the potential health impacts from inhalation exposure are unknown.

Much more research is needed in this space before we can make informed decisions about the use of nicotine-free and nicotine-free electronic cigarettes, and to better understand the impact of vaping on our health.

The author would like to thank Professor Ben Mullins and Dr Sébastien Allard, from Curtin University, who were co-responsible for this research project.

The conversation

MENAFN12102021000199003603ID1102954592

Legal warning: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We accept no responsibility for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this item, please contact the supplier above.


Source link

]]>
https://buscatox.info/many-e-cigarette-vaping-liquids-contain-toxic-chemicals-new/feed/ 0
EPA works against toxic chemicals; COVID-19, Complications of Pregnancy; Risk of drug addiction and infection https://buscatox.info/epa-works-against-toxic-chemicals-covid-19-complications-of-pregnancy-risk-of-drug-addiction-and-infection/ https://buscatox.info/epa-works-against-toxic-chemicals-covid-19-complications-of-pregnancy-risk-of-drug-addiction-and-infection/#respond Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:28:52 +0000 https://buscatox.info/epa-works-against-toxic-chemicals-covid-19-complications-of-pregnancy-risk-of-drug-addiction-and-infection/ The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will announce a plan to strengthen regulations against certain chemicals; increased risk of emergency complications in pregnant women with symptomatic COVID-19; fully vaccinated, heavy marijuana users with an addiction disorder linked to a greater susceptibility to breakthrough infection. EPA strengthens regulations against toxic chemicals As reported by The hillThe Environmental […]]]>

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will announce a plan to strengthen regulations against certain chemicals; increased risk of emergency complications in pregnant women with symptomatic COVID-19; fully vaccinated, heavy marijuana users with an addiction disorder linked to a greater susceptibility to breakthrough infection.

EPA strengthens regulations against toxic chemicals

As reported by The hillThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is set to announce a plan that would strengthen regulations against toxic chemicals known to disproportionately impact vulnerable populations. Polyfluoroalkyl compounds, or PFAS, have been linked to adverse health effects such as kidney and testicular cancer, and a 2015 study found PFAS to be present in the blood of 97% of Americans. An EPA spokesperson confirmed that it had engaged with the Defense Ministry in its efforts to combat PFAS, but no action was noted on whether this included action to combat PFAS from military bases, a major source of contamination.

Risk of pregnancy complications with symptomatic COVID-19 infection

According to 2 new studies, the risk of emergency complications may be increased in pregnant women who develop symptoms related to COVID-19, which would also put their children at risk, CNN reported. The study found that 58% of COVID-19 positive mothers with symptomatic infections gave birth under emergency circumstances, compared with 46% of mothers who had asymptomatic COVID-19 infections. Notably, infants born to symptomatic mothers were found to be significantly more likely to need oxygen support and be admitted to the intensive care unit.

Substance abuse disorders and the risk of groundbreaking COVID-19 infection

People with substance abuse disorders (SUD) who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19, especially heavy marijuana users, have been found to be more susceptible to breakthrough cases of the virus. Reported by Fox News, the results of the study published in Psychology of the world found that patients with SUD, including addiction to marijuana, alcohol, cocaine, opioids and tobacco, were almost 2 times more at risk of acute infections compared to those without SUD (7% vs. 3.6%), with patients who had used the disorder most at risk (7.8%). Marijuana advocates said the results did not show the drug could be a cause in the break-up cases, and noted that most users are not addicted to marijuana.


Source link

]]>
https://buscatox.info/epa-works-against-toxic-chemicals-covid-19-complications-of-pregnancy-risk-of-drug-addiction-and-infection/feed/ 0